Skip to main content

Blog

Another AT&T Security Fail

attemailfailI just got this forwarded from a friend in Nashville who is no longer with AT&T. They just send anyone's email to anybody, I guess. Think about what secure details could have been in this email. Just another example of AT&T's bad security and lack of attention when it comes to its own servers and data management.

Click picture to embiggen.

AT&T Doesn't Care About You

att 404Alright, so lets get some of the iPhone AT&T stuff out of the way. Cut back to late Monday night / Tuesday morning. Now, I'm a late worker anyway so I'm usually up around 3 and 4 in the morning. It turned out that everyone was twittering that the iPhone pre-sale would start at 3:00 my time. I figured I'd get it out of the way since I'm already up and I have stuff to do the next day. At 3:00 the store did, indeed go live and someone obviously dropped the ball. Most people have said it was AT&T's fault, but I don't think it was, completely. There were many steps involved to get the phone and it looked like most of them were checking AT&T's servers. I'd let the thing sit and chew on it while I did other things, then come back to it. Most of the time if would error out, but about 5 times I got to the "add to cart" section. I'm pretty sure once you're there, it's not AT&T's fault if you can't add it to your cart. After about 40 attempts or so, I gave up and ordered from AT&T, which is another mistake. If you have any issues with the phone on AT&T, you have to get them fixed through AT&T. If you have issues from buying from the Apple Online Store, you have to send the thing back to them. The best way to do it is to pick up in-store.

Kossome Techcast Episode 66

techcast
Friday, June 11th, 2010
Sprint CFO Says EVO Can Take on iPhone 4. ORLY?
What makes Apple's branding better?





Sprint CFO Says EVO Can Take on iPhone 4. ORLY?

dave gadgetsThe Sprint CFO says that the HTC EVO can take on the iPhone 4. I know he thinks the EVO is great because it's his company, but everyone thinks their kids are the cutest kids in the world. There are always these quote, unquote "iPhone killers" that come along and are all the rage for about 15 minutes. Then brand confusion is created when you come out with another phone that's better a month later. EVO will go the way of the Palm Pre, mark my words. Remember when that phone was all the rage? Where is it now? What's the best Android phone, and who makes it? How does the average consumer understand the difference between buzzwords, brands, and operating systems like smartphone, HTC, Droid, Incredible, Google Phone, Android, & EVO? With Apple, you know the best one is the latest one, and they're released about once a year. Take LG for example... they announced that they are releasing 20 Android smartphones this year. Really? How will anyone know what to buy? The five so far are the LG GW620, the LG Optimus GT540, the LG Ally for Verizon, the LG Optimus Q LU2300 and the LG SU2300. Only 15 more confusing model numbers left to go this year. Will the average consumer sort through them, or just say I want the iPhone 4? Branding makes these phones sell. For example, the iPhone 4 has FaceTime and a Retina display. If we were to convert that into LG speak, or any other brand for that matter, it would sound like this...
The LG Fathom VS750 won't do video calls, but it does have Windows Mobile® 6.5 Professional installed with a screen that has 262K Color TFT & 800 x 480 Pixels. Apple has the branding thing going for them, so tell me how these other phones are going to compete?

Jobs Kicks Google in the Ads

steve jobsiAds are no doubt not only a money maker for Apple, but a way to fire back at Google. Steve Jobs tries to make it sound like he's not at war with Google. He cleverly choses his words to make everyone feel better. He's been quoted as saying, "We did not enter the search business, They entered the phone business." But search isn't Google's business. It's advertising. That's where all their money comes from. So these iAds are a way to make ad revenue the way Jobs wants to, and takes a slice of the Google pie, which will be served up cold, if you get my drift. The FTC has been looking into these iAds, but we'll see if they ever take the investigation any further. Having exclusive deals to run exclusive ads on an exclusively closed system is quite ballsy when you're already being criticized for being a closed platform.

Google Taking a Shot at Bing with Backgrounds?

google vs bingThere has been an uproar over Google's decision to add photo backgrounds to their search page. I don't know if this is a "me too" moment for Google in order to look like Bing, or if it's actually a shot at Bing. Maybe it's Google's way of saying, "Look, we can add a picture to our homepage too, it doesn't mean the value of our algorithm changes." But everyone is up in arms over this. It's the end of a tradition. "Oh no, what will we do without a clean search page?" Well, iGoogle has been around forever, so this only changes it for people who use the default Google homepage. Plus, you can turn this option off. My opinion is that it is, indeed, a shot at Bing. Maybe they're getting a little uneasy since Safari 5 and iPhone 4 now have Bing search.

The Fake iPad Commercial

UPDATE: Not even 30 minutes after I posted this article, the band cola-cola posted the new song on their myspace page. You heard it first here!

ipad1The leaked Apple Ad for the iPad is an obvious fake. Here are the reasons...

1) The product in the video is obviously a 3D rendering. Apple usually uses the real thing in their commercials. Notice the ports on the back. They're flat. Not three dimensional. Plus the falloff shadow on the first shot is nice and even like a spot light in any 3D animation program.
ipad2
2) These ports are flawed. Note the magsafe adapter on the back. How would you charge this or use any of these ports for that matter if they were on the back?

3) Apple stopped putting Firewire 400 on their products to conserve precious space. Why would they bring it back on an even more compact device?

4) The song playing is not recognized by Shazam, so it's probably not a mainstream band.

5) The music is not mastered well. It sounds a little like it was an amateur recording.

6) This is obviously an online marketing campaign for the band Cola-Cola out of LA.
ipad3

History Channel Selling HD video that's not HD

ww2hdAs someone who is surrounded with video technology on a regular basis, it really makes me laugh to look at a DVD and see a label that says, "Filmed in HD." This is what I see on many DVD's in the stores now days because it's a buzz word. The looping fireplace DVD I got for Christmas last year had this written on it, and it's just funny to see from a videographer's perspective because it just doesn't matter. No matter what camera you shoot it with, it still has to be down-converted to standard definition in order to be saved on a DVD. No matter what you do, a DVD is still a DVD.

Keep that in mind while I describe the new series on The History Channel. Everything about this commercial and website makes the documentary look like it's in HD, but it isn't. The name of the show itself is "WWII in HD," but nothing about it is actually HD. The show originally aired on The History Channel in HD, but that is all. Again, as a videographer and editor this really bugs me. They're using HD as a buzzword to trick people into buying.

It's advertised at $7.95 and there are no disclaimers on the commercial or the website that it isn't in HD. The website says, "...full, immersive HD color." "...as well as HD color..." "...converted to HD with meticulous technique..." That is wrong. These techniques were used to create the original, but that is not what they are selling.

When You Go Viral - Learning from the AAOJ incident

viral
If you follow my articles or follow me on any social media site, you probably heard all the excitement about the American Airlines Orange Juice incident. This article is not about the incident itself, but about what happens online when something you do goes viral. When the story first broke on The Consumerist, my site got a bunch of hits, but not more than it could handle. Only a handful of people that read the article were clicking on the link to my site. I can only imagine how many hits they got on that story. The kicker was when someone posted a direct link to the article on Fark.com. I knew Fark was a bigger site, but had no idea it would generate that kind of traffic. My site could hardly take it. I had a pretty large bandwidth package from Godaddy.com and I figured it would be fine if anything went viral. But I was wrong.

Response to Heather, the Flight Attendant

I've had many negative responses and positive responses to the AA OJ story. I brushed most of the negative ones off. But Heather, a flight attendant, wrote a response that truly shows her ignorance. She's actually standing up for the flight attendant. Not only that, but she admits to not reading the entire article, which pretty much makes her whole point invalid. Here's my response...

Dear Heather,

Syndicate content